MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978551451 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2002.0030

A Gift from Jean-Jacques Rousseau to George Simon Harcourt: Etchings and Proofs of the Illustrations to His Works

2002· article· en· W1978551451 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ann-Marie Thornton

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)Possession (linguistics)Art historyExhibitionMathematical proofArtPhilosophyClassicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Gift fromJean-Jacques Rousseau to George Simon Harcourt: Etchings and Proofs of the Illustrations to His Works Ann-Marie Thornton This article offers a history and description ofa portfolio containing engravings which once constitutedJean-Jacques Rousseau's personal collection ofillustrations to his works and which he offered to George Simon Harcourt, Viscount Nuneham (1736-1809) during his stay in England, from 11 January 1766 to 21 May 1767. The portfolio was inventoried and exhibited for the first time by the present author on 28 October 1995 at the Voltaire Foundation, Oxford, with the kind permission of its owner, the Honourable Mrs Gascoigne, née Harcourt.1 This study will trace the circumstances under which the engravings came into the possession of the Harcourt family, account for their particular arrangement in the portfolio, and offer a description of each plate. It will also seek to determine how and when Rousseau originally acquired the illustrations, and which engravings he valued most highly. Rousseau's ownership of a given proof is of particular interest in the light of comments made in his correspondence, a rereading of which will indicate the extent to which this hitherto unknown collection of engravings offers pre1 The exhibition, entitled "A Portfolio of Rousseau Engravings in Oxfordshire, Accompanied by Illustrations to Early Editions oíJulie in Oxford Libraries," is recorded in Etudes Jean-Jacques Rousseau 8 (1996), p. 319; The Collected Writings ofRousseau, vol. 6, Julie, or The New Hêloïse, ed. and trans. Philip Stewart and Jean Vaché (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1997), p. xxxi. EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION, Volume 14, Numbers 2-3, April-July 2002 442EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION cious new insights into the publishing history of the illustrations to Rousseau's works. In a postscript to a letter of 14 February 1767, Rousseau offered his portfolio containing the illustrations to his works to Harcourt with the words: "Il doit y avoir parmi mes estampes un petit portefeuille contenant de bonnes épreuves de celles de tous mes écrits. Oserai-je me flatter que vous ne dédaignerez pas ce foible cadeau, et de placer ce portefeuille parmi les vôtres?"2 The gift was intended to thank Harcourt for overseeing the sale of Rousseau's collection of prints from 10 February 1767 (Leigh 5724). Rousseau clearly preferred to offer the illustrations to his works to an admirer rather than to have them sold along with his other engravings. From Rousseau's collection , Harcourt also acquired a substantial collection ofrare works by Jean-Claude Richard de St Non, and a smaller but equally rare collection of prints engraved and offered to Rousseau by Claude-Henri Watelet in December 1765.3 In 1910, Louis-Jean Courtois expressed the hope that "peut-être quelque châtelain anglais pourrait-il renseigner les rousseauistes sur le sort des livres et des estampes du maître."4 The location of the engravings offered to Harcourt has indeed remained obscure. In 1760, Harcourt's father, the first Earl Harcourt (1714-1777), moved the Harcourt family seat from Stanton Harcourt Manor to Nuneham Park, situated to the south of Oxford. Harcourt inherited the estate and the title Earl Harcourt in September 1777. His portfolios may have been housed in the library, which was transferred to the North Wing from 1781 as part of an extensive villa conversion. In 1880, Edward William Harcourt republished Rousseau's letters to Harcourt and affirmed that "the drawings, prints and etchings alluded to in the letters are still to be found in portfolios at Nuneham."5 However, neitherJacques Voisine nor Ralph A. Leigh, who catalogued George 2 Correspondance complète deJean-Jacques Rousseau, ed. R.A. Leigh, 52 vols (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1965-98), letter 5728. References are to this edition by letter number. 3 George Simon Harcourt to Rousseau: 9, 10, or 11 March 1767 (Leigh 5770);January 1768 (Leigh 6215). 4 Louis-Jean Courtois, Le Séjour deJ-J. Rousseau en Angleterre (1766—1767): lettres et documents inédits, 2 parts (Geneva:Jullien, 1910), p. 81. 5 Harcourt Papers, ed. Edward William Harcourt (Oxford: James Parker, 1876-1905), 11:4. The letters reproduced on pp. 4-17 of the Harcourt Papers correspond to Leigh...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207