MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978567902 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2001.0868

The initial boundary problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation on the negative quarter-plane

2002· article· en· W1978567902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. R. Marchant, Noel F. Smyth

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKorteweg–de Vries equationMathematicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Boundary value problemPlane (geometry)Mathematical analysisBoundary (topology)Initial value problemSolitonBoundary valuesMathematical physicsGeometryPhysicsNonlinear systemQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The initial boundary–value problem for the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation on the negative quarter–plane, x < 0 and t > 0, is considered. The formulation of this problem is different to the usual initial boundary–value problem on the positive quarter–plane, for which x > 0 and t > 0. Two boundary conditions are required at x = 0 for the negative quarter–plane problem, in contrast to the one boundary condition needed at x = 0 for the positive quarter–plane problem. Solutions of the KdV equation on the infinite line, such as the soliton, cnoidal wave, mean height variation and undular bore solution, are used to find approximate solutions to the negative quarter–plane problem. Five qualitatively different types of solution are found, depending on the relation between the initial and boundary values. Excellent comparisons are obtained between these solutions and full numerical solutions of the KdV equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207