MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1978573557 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0002

Reference Sources for Canadian Literary Studies (review)

2007· article· en· W1978573557 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sandra Alston

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)HistoryComicsNarrativeLiteratureLibrary sciencePoetryArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Reference Sources for Canadian Literary Studies Sandra Alston (bio) Joseph Jones. Reference Sources for Canadian Literary Studies University of Toronto Press. xiv, 464. $128.00 In this reference work, Joseph Jones, former reference librarian, now Librarian emeritus at the University of British Columbia, has attempted to 'map the terrain' of the 'bibliographical wilderness' that is Canadian literature. While he does not define 'Canadian,' 'literature' is 'any kind of writing that may have interest as writing.' As well as drama, poetry, and fiction, an examination of the text suggests that this also includes theatre and film, first-person Indian narratives, diaries, and comic books. Canadian literature in English is the prime focus; however, a small selection of sources for Quebec, French literature in Canada, and writing in other languages than English and French is also discussed. Coverage includes titles to 2002, with a few entries dated 2003, and since Jones has included this title as item a-001, one, dated incorrectly as 2004. The arrangement of this work would indicate that it is meant primarily for the reference librarian. Rather than by subject or genre, the titles are classified by format or type of material into nineteen chapters: 'Reference Guides'; 'Dictionaries, Encyclopedias, Handbooks'; 'Serial Bibliographies'; 'Single Bibliographies, Literature'; 'Single Bibliographies, General Canadian'; 'Catalogues'; 'Special Collections and Archives'; 'Indexes'; 'Periodicals'; 'Dissertations and Theses'; 'Anthologies'; 'Histories and Surveys'; 'Biography'; 'Directories'; 'Children's Literature'; 'Translation'; 'Language'; 'Selected Topics'; 'Other Sources.' Within these headings arrangement is chronological, with the most recent dates first. There is an appendix of subject headings and classifications and four indexes: name, title, subject, and chronological. Jones has spread his net widely, from a seven-page brief bibliography of 'available titles in Canadian fiction, poetry and related background material,' published in 1970, to a reference to the subscription-based Research Libraries Group's union catalogue of more than 126 million records. Subjects range from authors and poets of Grey and Bruce counties in 1973 to the Arts and Humanities Citation Index. It is precisely this wide array of both types of material and subjects that is most frustrating about this work. There is a truly useful reference tool on Canadian literature buried here among many general reference titles better suited to a work such as the American Library Association's Guide to Reference Books, or Mary Bond's Canadian Reference Sources, both of which are actually included in this work. Jones refers in his introduction to the migration of reference sources from printed to electronic form, and has included some databases and websites, solving the problem of unstable URLS by, except in [End Page 339] a few instances, listing web sites without giving specific addresses. This was a sensible decision, as several of the URLS mentioned have changed since the text was published. Useful comments on the genre of publication, and an overview of the literature, context, and relationships to other sections of the work preface most chapters. Within each chapter the individual titles are annotated, usually by a précis of the work's introduction. There is no critical evaluation of the titles, and in many cases, no indication of the literary content, as in, for example, Canada in the Making, a digitized file of Canadian government documents. The decision to arrange the titles by form, rather than by subject, has meant an unfortunate dispersal of texts on the same topic throughout various chapters, only partially ameliorated by the subject index. It is here one discovers that reference sources in Aboriginal literature are spread throughout ten chapters. The purpose of the chronological index is hard to determine. While the work is flawed, both in its lack of definition, and its inclusion of too many general titles not directly related to the subject at hand, Reference Sources for Canadian Literary Studies is nevertheless a useful tool. Students of Canadian studies need subject guides to the literature; here they will find many helpful suggestions, provided they are willing to persevere through the profusion of general titles and the complex format classification. Sandra Alston Sandra Alston, University of Toronto Libraries Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0340.062
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1980.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→