The perceived effects of practising meditation on women's sexual and relational lives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Meditation, particularly mindfulness meditation, has been gaining in popularity and credibility in recent years as a therapeutic intervention for a wide range of concerns. However, little research has examined its effect on sexuality and intimate relationships. This phenomenological study explores women's experiences with meditative practices with regard to their romantic relationships and physical intimacy. Interviews were conducted with 10 women, married and unmarried, between the ages of 28 and 44 years old. Participants had been practicing meditation including a mindfulness component for six months or more (9 of the 10 had begun meditating within the past 7 years). Five themes were identified: (1) harmony in day-to-day life, (2) enhanced sexual life, (3) love deepened, (4) indirect benefits to the relationship and (5) challenges. The application of these themes to counselling practice and future research are discussed. Keywords: mindfulnessmeditationromantic relationshipssexualitywomen Notes Note: Most participants did not have a strict regimen for practice so both the frequency and duration varied widely. Because of this they were asked to provide a range rather than an estimate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it