Faecal calprotectin: a noninvasive diagnostic tool and marker of severity in pouchitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In pouchitis, the mucosa is infiltrated by activated polymorphonuclear neutrophils capable of producing calprotectin, a stable antimicrobial myelomonocytic protein. AIM: The aim is to assess the ability of faecal calprotectin to differentiate between inflamed and noninflamed ileal pouches, and to correlate this with inflammation severity using the newly developed Objective Pouchitis Score. METHOD: Fifty-four stool samples were collected from patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy; 46 from patients with ulcerative colitis and eight from those with familial adenomatous polyposis coli. Faecal calprotectin concentrations were determined by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. RESULTS: Of the ulcerative colitis patients, six were diagnosed with pouchitis and pre-pouch ileitis (median faecal calprotectin: 865 microg/g, with a range of 95-2350 microg/g); 13 had pouchitis alone (145, 33-3350 microg/g) and 27 were uninflamed (56, 4-705 microg/g). Of the familial adenomatous polyposis patients, one had pouchitis and pre-pouch ileitis (305 microg/g), and seven had noninflamed pouches (9, 6-26 microg/g). Stool samples obtained from pouchitis patients had significantly higher calprotectin concentrations compared with those obtained from uninflamed pouches (Mann-Whitney: P<0.0001). Faecal calprotectin concentrations correlated closely with the Objective Pouchitis Score, the Pouch Disease Activity Index and endoscopic and histological inflammatory scores (Spearman rank test: P values <0.0001). Using a faecal calprotectin threshold of >or=92.5 microg/g to define a positive result, Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 76.5%. CONCLUSION: Faecal calprotectin measurement is a useful noninvasive tool in the diagnosis of acutely inflamed ileal pouches and correlates well with the severity of pouchitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".