MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978602095 · doi:10.7202/1024963ar

L’évaluation dans la formation supérieure et professionnelle

2014· article· fr· W1978602095 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Françoise Campanale, Gilles Raîche

Bibliographic record

VenueMesure et évaluation en éducation · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEvaluation and Performance Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValuation (finance)Political scienceHumanitiesEconomicsArtFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article a pour objectif de dresser un portrait du traitement de l’évaluation dans la formation supérieure à l’intérieur de la revue Mesure et évaluation en éducation depuis sa création il y a trente ans. L’analyse a été effectuée en fonction de trois contextes distincts. Il s’agit de l’évaluation dans la formation supérieure pour en améliorer la qualité, de l’évaluation dans la formation professionnelle initiale et de l’évaluation dans la formation continue. En conclusion, des constats tirés de cette analyse nous amèneront à proposer des perspectives de recherche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.129
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1290.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.509
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMesure et évaluation en éducationSame topicEvaluation and Performance AssessmentFrench-language works237,207