Efficient algorithm and architecture for elliptic curve cryptography for extremely constrained secure applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, considerable research has been performed in cryptography and security to optimize the area, power, timing, and energy needed for the point multiplication operations over binary elliptic curves. In this paper, we propose an efficient implementation of point multiplication on Koblitz curves targeting extremely-constrained, secure applications. We utilize the Gaussian normal basis (GNB) representation of field elements over GF(2m) and employ an efficient bit-level GNB multiplier. One advantage of this GNB multiplier is that we are able to reduce the hardware complexity through sharing the addition/accumulation with other field additions. We utilized the special property of normal basis representation and squarings are implemented very efficiently by only rewiring in hardware. We introduce a new technique for point addition in affine coordinate which requires fewer registers. Based on this technique, we propose an extremely small processor architecture for point multiplication. Through application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) implementations, we evaluate the area, performance, and energy consumption of the proposed crypto-processor. Utilizing two different working frequencies, it is shown that the proposed architecture reaches better results compared to the previous works, making it suitable for extremely-constrained, secure environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".