Enterotoxin-producing staphylococci cause intestinal inflammation by a combination of direct epithelial cytopathy and superantigen-mediated T-cell activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterotoxin-producing Staphylococcus aureus may cause severe inflammatory intestinal disease, particularly in infants or immunodeficient or elderly patients. They are also recognized to be associated with sudden infant death syndrome. Little is known, however, about mucosal responses to staphylococci. METHODS: The mucosal lesion in three infants with staphylococcal enterocolitis was assessed by immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. The organisms underwent extensive molecular analysis. Their toxins were assessed for capacity to induce T-cell activation and host mucosal responses examined by in vitro organ culture. Epithelial responses were studied by coculture with HEp-2 and Caco-2 cells. RESULTS: Intestinal biopsies from the patients showed marked epithelial damage with mucosal inflammation. The three staphylococci, representing two distinct clones, were methicillin-sensitive, producing SEG/I enterotoxins and Rho-inactivating EDIN toxins. Their enterotoxins potently activated T cells, but only whole organisms could induce in vitro enteropathy, characterized by remarkable epithelial desquamation uninhibited by tacrolimus. EDIN-producing staphylococci, but not their supernatants, induced striking cytopathy in HEp-2 epithelial cells but not in Caco-2 cells. Although HEp-2 and Caco-2 cells produced similar IL-8, CCL20, and cathelicidin LL37 responses upon bacterial exposure, only Caco-2 cells expressed mRNA for the β-defensins HBD2 and HBD3, while HEp-2 cells were unable to do so. CONCLUSIONS: Staphylococci induce enterocolitis by a combination of direct enterocyte cytopathy mediated by EDIN toxins, disrupting the epithelial barrier, and enterotoxin superantigen-induced mucosal T-cell activation. Gut epithelial production of β-defensins may contribute to host defense against invasive staphylococcal disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".