MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978640465 · doi:10.3139/217.2575

Effect of Blend Ratio of h-LLDPE and LDPE on Tear Properties of Blown Films

2012· article· en· W1978640465 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Polymer Processing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterial Properties and Processing
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersSaudi Basic Industries CorporationKing Abdulaziz City for Science and TechnologyKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsLow-density polyethyleneLinear low-density polyethyleneMaterials scienceComposite materialTear resistancePolymerImpact resistancePolymer blendPlastics extrusionUltimate tensile strength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the present study, blown films of h-LLDPE, LDPE, and their blends were produced using a twin screw extruder. The tear properties of all films were determined in the machine direction (MD) and the transverse direction (TD). On one hand, similar values of the MD tear-resistance for the two virgin polymers, h-LLDPE and LDPE, were measured to be 100 and 120 kN/m, respectively. On the other hand, the TD tear-resistance value of h-LLDPE was 180 kN/m, four times higher than that of LDPE, 45 kN/m. It was observed that small additions of LDPE (5 to 20 wt.%) to h-LLDPE produced blends with better TD tear-resistance films, 400 kN/m. The main reason for this large increase in tear-resistance was attributed to the morphological changes induced by the addition of the LDPE polymer, as shown by SEM, FTIR, and birefringence techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it