MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978657819 · doi:10.4103/2348-0548.148393

Profound hypertension with dexmedetomidine during insertion of deep brain stimulator

2015· article· en· W1978657819 on OpenAlexaff
Allison Tedder, Evgeny Rakhman, Pirjo Manninen, Lashmikumar Venkatraghavan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDexmedetomidineMedicineSedationAnesthesiaLoading doseBlood pressureDystoniaDeep brain stimulationSurgeryDiseaseParkinson's diseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dexmedetomidine is now frequently used in the anaesthetic management of patients undergoing deep brain stimulator insertion for movement disorders. We present two patients with Parkinson’s disease and dystonia who developed marked increase in blood pressure and level of sedation during the infusion of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg over 10 min). Both patients required treatment of their blood pressure. The first patient also had a computed tomography of the brain to rule out an intracranial event. The patients recovered from these untoward events in approximately 30 min. The possible explanations for both the hypertension and oversedation were underestimation of the severity of the patients’ underlying disease process and a relative overdose of the loading dose of dexmedetomidine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical CareSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207