MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978665317 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.61.7669

Coherent control of photocurrents in graphene and carbon nanotubes

2000· article· en· W1978665317 on OpenAlexaff
E. J. Melé, Petr Král, David Tománek

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneCarbon nanotubePhysicsCondensed matter physicsElectronic band structurePhotocurrentExcited stateSuperposition principleBand gapPhotonPolarization (electrochemistry)AsymmetryQuantum mechanicsMaterials scienceNanotechnologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coherent one-photon $(2\ensuremath{\omega})$ and two-photon $(\ensuremath{\omega})$ electronic excitations are studied for graphene sheets and for carbon nanotubes using a long-wavelength theory for the low-energy electronic states. For graphene sheets we find that a coherent superposition of these excitations produces a polar asymmetry in the momentum space distribution of the excited carriers with an angular dependence that depends on the relative polarization and phases of the incident fields. For semiconducting nanotubes we find a similar effect which depends on the square of the semiconducting gap, and we calculate its frequency dependence. We find that the third-order nonlinearity, which controls the direction of the photocurrent is robust for semiconducting tubes and vanishes in the continuum theory for conducting tubes. We calculate corrections to these results arising from higher-order crystal-field effects on the band structure and briefly discuss some applications of the theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207