MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978689005 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0159

Can Spring Wheat‐Growing Megaenvironments in the Northern Great Plains Be Dissected for Representative Locations or Niche‐Adapted Genotypes?

2006· article· en· W1978689005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetics and Plant Breeding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersWestern Grains Research FoundationAlberta Agricultural Research InstituteAlberta Crop Industry Development Fund
KeywordsBiologyGene–environment interactionNicheGenotypeGermplasmYield (engineering)Grain yieldAgronomyEcologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Characterizing variety testing sites and identification of sites with negligible genotype × environment crossover interaction is important for plant breeders wishing to identify superior germplasm and (or) cultivars for a wide range of environments. Long‐term multilocation grain yield data from the regional hard red spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) variety trials from 1981 to 2002 (472 location years assessing 64 wheat genotypes) in Alberta, Canada, were employed for this study. The shifted multiplicative model (SHMM) and the site regression model (SREG) were used to group testing sites into subsets with reduced crossover interaction. Both models identified yearly subsets of testing sites with negligible crossover interaction. However, the yearly site groupings did not generally follow a repeatable pattern over years. Clustering did not correspond with provincial agroclimatic classification, nor did it correspond with site‐specific yield potential. Genotype × environment patterns were therefore inconsistent over the years, mainly because of complex, highly variable, and unpredictable year × location effects. We identified sites appearing to be more discriminative and predictive of average genotype performance. This suggests that regional variety trials may be conducted at a fewer more representative locations predictive of average varietal performance. We conclude that the spring wheat growing areas in Alberta (and in the northern Great Plains in general) belong to a single megaenvironment with unpredictable crossover interaction patterns. Because of the highly variable and unpredictable genotype × environment interaction patterns in Alberta, genotypic selection targeting wide adaptation is recommended. Although genotype × environment patterns were not repeatable, the yearly high yielding and stable varieties were repeatedly selected over years. These varieties were the most popular varieties grown by farmers during the testing time period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it