Heterogeneous Crystal Growth of Methane Hydrate on Its sII [001] Crystallographic Face
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic molecular simulation study of the heterogeneous crystal growth of methane hydrate sII from supersaturated aqueous methane solutions. The growth of sII hydrate on the [001] crystallographic face is achieved through utilization of a recently proposed methodology, and rates of crystal growth of 1 A/ns were sustained for the molecular models and specific conditions employed in this work. Characteristics of the crystals grown as well as properties and structure of the interface are examined. Water cages with a 5(12)6(3) arrangement, which are improper to both sI and sII structures, are identified during the heterogeneous growth of sII methane hydrate. We show that the growth of a [001] face of sII hydrate can produce an sI crystalline structure, confirming that cross-nucleation of methane hydrate structures is possible. Defects consisting of two methane molecules trapped in large 5(12)6(4) cages and water molecules trapped in small and large cages are observed, where in one instance we have found a large 5(12)6(4) cage containing three water molecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".