MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978695144 · doi:10.2138/am.2006.1815

Upper limit of the tetrahedral rotation angle and factors affecting octahedral flattening in synthetic and natural 1M polytype C2/m space group micas

2006· article· en· W1978695144 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick H. J. Mercier

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCrystallographyTetrahedronOctahedronMicaCrystal structureChemistryCrystal chemistryCrystal (programming language)Single crystalVacancy defectMaterials scienceGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have used recently developed quantitative crystal chemical models and a simple structural free-energy model to examine and interpret: (1) previously reported powder X-ray diffraction data for several trioctahedral mica solid solution series (64 synthetic powder samples between the Mg, Co, Ni, and Fe end-members, with different degrees of oxidation, vacancy contents, and Al/Si ratios; indexed as 1M polytype, space group C2/m; supplemented here by 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy to obtain accurate iron-site populations of IV Fe 3+ , VI Fe 3+ , and VI Fe 2+ ), and (2) 175 previously published single-crystal refinements comprising 138 natural and 37 synthetic 1M mica samples refined in space group C2/m. The crystal chemical models were validated by comparisons between predicted and measured relations between structural parameters, and needed model parameters and their uncertainties were extracted, using the single-crystal refinements. Two main results arise. First, an observed limit value of the b lattice parameter in certain synthetic solid solution series is shown to correspond to an upper limit value for the tetrahedral rotation angle α of αmax = 9.5° for AlSi 3 tetrahedral sheets in K-rich micas. This upper limit is also clearly seen in the single-crystal refinement data for those Krich single-crystals that have near-AlSi 3 tetrahedral compositions. We argue that the (tetrahedral sheet composition dependent) upper limit of tetrahedral rotation is an intrinsic property of the tetrahedral sheet (presumably corresponding to an intra-tetrahedral-sheet bond-bending limit) rather than arising either from interactions with the interlayer cations or from an octahedral sheet lateral-contraction limit. Second, we find that, except in the extreme cases where one approaches the lower (α = 0°) or upper (α = α max ) tetrahedral rotation limits, the magnitude of the octahedral flattening angle ψ is predominantly determined by octahedral cation stereo-chemical bonding requirements (and other intra-octahedral-sheet properties such as intra-sheet bond bending and intra-sheet electrostatic forces) rather than arising from tetrahedral-octahedral inter-sheet interactions (as generally argued or assumed). In addition, we corroborate a previously reported difference in the crystal chemical behaviors of trivalent octahedral cation (Fe 3+ , Al 3+ ) and vacancy-bearing trioctahedral micas relative to samples that contain only divalent octahedral cations (e.g., Fe-Mg, Fe-Ni, Mg-Ni, and Co-Mg synthetic series); their b vs. average octahedral metal-oxygen bond-length behaviors are dramatically different, a result that is consistent with our proposed dominant stereo-chemical control of ψ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyFrench-language works237,207