MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978718503 · doi:10.1109/tim.2014.2313431

On System-on-Chip Testing Using Hybrid Test Vector Compression

2014· article· en· W1978718503 on OpenAlexafffund
Satyendra N. Biswas, Sunil R. Das, Emil M. Petriu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLossless compressionComputer scienceTest vectorEmbedded systemSystem on a chipComputer hardwareTest compressionOverhead (engineering)Benchmark (surveying)Data compressionVery-large-scale integrationAutomatic test pattern generationIntegration testingFault coverageElectronic circuitSoftwareEngineeringTest setAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comprehensive hybrid test vector compression method for very large scale integration (VLSI) circuit testing, targeting specifically embedded cores-based system-on-chips (SoCs). In the proposed approach, a software program is loaded into the on-chip processor memory along with the compressed test data sets. To minimize on-chip storage besides testing time, the test data volume is first reduced by compaction in a hybrid manner before downloading into the processor. The method uses a set of adaptive coding techniques for realizing lossless compression. The compaction program need not to be loaded into the embedded processor, as only the decompression of test data is required for the automatic test equipment (ATE). The developed scheme necessitates minimal hardware overhead, while the on-chip embedded processor can be reused for normal operation on completion of testing. This paper reports results on studies of the problem and demonstrates the feasibility of the suggested methodology with simulation runs on the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 85 combinational and ISCAS 89 full-scan sequential benchmark circuits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207