MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978738556 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/2/134

<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>AND GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONS OF THE TYPE Iax SUPERNOVAE SN 2005hk AND SN 2008A

2014· article· en· W1978738556 on OpenAlexaff
C. McCully, Saurabh W. Jha, R. J. Foley, R. Chornock, Jon A. Holtzman, D. D. Balam, David Branch, A. V. Filippenko, J. Frieman, J. P. U. Fynbo, L. Galbany, M. Ganeshalingam, P. Garnavich, M. L. Graham, E. Y. Hsiao, G. Leloudas, Douglas C. Leonard, Weidong Li, Adam G. Riess, M. Šako, Donald P. Schneider, J. M. Silverman, J. Sollerman, T. N. Steele, Rollin Thomas, J. C. Wheeler, Chen Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical ObservatoryHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyVetenskapsrådetU.S. Naval ObservatoryNational Science FoundationCase Western Reserve UniversityFermilabMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-GesellschaftChinese Academy of SciencesNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthUniversität BaselUniversity of PittsburghLos Alamos National LaboratoryAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonPrinceton UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityOhio State UniversityCalifornia Institute of TechnologySpace Telescope Science InstituteW. M. Keck FoundationDrexel UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsSupernovaAstrophysicsEjectaPhotometry (optics)White dwarfHubble space telescopeSpitzer Space TelescopePair-instability supernovaAstronomyInfraredSpectral lineStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) and ground-based optical and near-infrared observations of SN 2005hk and SN 2008A, typical members of the Type Iax class of supernovae (SNe). Here we focus on late-time observations, where these objects deviate most dramatically from all other SN types. Instead of the dominant nebular emission lines that are observed in other SNe at late phases, spectra of SNe 2005hk and 2008A show lines of Fe ii , Ca ii , and Fe i more than a year past maximum light, along with narrow [Fe ii ] and [Ca ii ] emission. We use spectral features to constrain the temperature and density of the ejecta, and find high densities at late times, with n e ≳ 10 9 cm −3 . Such high densities should yield enhanced cooling of the ejecta, making these objects good candidates to observe the expected "infrared catastrophe," a generic feature of SN Ia models. However, our HST photometry of SN 2008A does not match the predictions of an infrared catastrophe. Moreover, our HST observations rule out a "complete deflagration" that fully disrupts the white dwarf for these peculiar SNe, showing no evidence for unburned material at late times. Deflagration explosion models that leave behind a bound remnant can match some of the observed properties of SNe Iax, but no published model is consistent with all of our observations of SNe 2005hk and 2008A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207