MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978749730 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112479200

Correlation Between tRNALys3 Aminoacylation and Its Incorporation into HIV-1

2002· article· en· W1978749730 on OpenAlexaff
Hassan Javanbakht, Shan Cen, Karin Musier‐Forsyth, Lawrence Kleiman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAminoacylationTransfer RNAT armMutantBiologyRNAStereochemistryChemistryBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) assembly, tRNA(Lys) is selectively packaged into the virus, where tRNA(Lys3) serves as the primer for reverse transcription. Lysyl-tRNA synthetase is also selectively incorporated into HIV-1 and is therefore a strong candidate for being the signal by which viral proteins interact with tRNA(Lys) isoacceptors. Previously, mutations in the tRNA(Lys3) anticodon have been shown to strongly inhibit the charging of tRNA(Lys3) by lysyl-tRNA synthetase in vitro, and we show here that in vivo aminoacylation is also inhibited by anticodon changes. The order of decreasing in vivo aminoacylation for tRNA(Lys3) anticodon mutants is: wild-type SUU (where S = mcm(5)S(2)U) 100%) --> SGU (49%) --> CGU (40%) --> SGA (0%) and CGA (0%). We found that the ability of these tRNA(Lys3) anticodon variants to be aminoacylated in vivo is directly correlated with their ability to be packaged into HIV-1. These data showed that the anticodon is a major determinant for tRNA(Lys3) packaging and support the conclusion that its productive interaction with lysyl-tRNA synthetase is important for tRNA(Lys3) incorporation into HIV-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207