MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978764717 · doi:10.5354/n.v0i13.15288

Derrotando el bigenerismo: cambiando supuestos de género en el siglo XXI

2011· article· es· W1978764717 on OpenAlex
Miqqui Alicia Gilbert, Inger Flem

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNomadías · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El Bigenerismo (binarismo de genero) plantea que solo hay dos generos, los cuales corresponden a dos sexos, masculino y femenino. El bigenerismo basico requiere que documentos legales e instituciones publicas designen un solo genero invariable (esto es, el sexo). El bigenerismo estricto aplica estas categorias en un contexto social que estigmatiza como “imperfecto” a hombres y mujeres que no alcanzan los ideales impuestos por el esquema bigenerista. Discuto estos conceptos y sus implicancias, presento tres modelos que sucesivamente debilitan los supuestos bigeneristas, y abogo por el mas radical de los tres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it