PIV Investigation of Separated and Reattached Turbulent Flows Over Ribs of Various Aspect Ratio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental study is undertaken to investigate the features of separated and reattached flow over surface mounted traverse ribs of varying aspect ratio (1:1, 1:2, and 1:4) in a recirculating open channel turbulent flow. A particle image velocimetry system was used to conduct the velocity measurements. Upstream conditions were kept consistent among all three test cases. The reattachment length of the separated flow was found to decrease as rib aspect ratio increased, primarily as a result of a secondary separation reattachment formation on the ribs of increased aspect ratio. Contour plots of mean velocities, turbulence intensities, turbulent kinetic energy and Reynolds shear stresses, as well as one-dimensional profiles of streamwise mean velocity, turbulent kinetic energy and Reynolds shear stress in the recirculation and reattachment region are presented and discussed. The results show that maximum wall-normal mean velocities are approximately 40% of the approach freestream velocity. The results also indicate that the turbulence levels downstream of the block tend to decrease as the rib aspect ratio increases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".