Intestinal Toxicity Induced by 5-Fluorouracil in Pigs: A New Preclinical Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to develop an animal model of intestinal injury induced by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in pigs. METHODS: Six domestic pigs were used as control (healthy group) and another 6 malnourished pigs orally received 5-FU (treated group). After 4 weeks of treatment, pigs were sacrificed and jejunum, ileum and colon were isolated for histological, immunological and biochemical analyses. RESULTS: 5-FU caused a decrease in the intestinal mass. Disaccharidase, and phosphate alkaline activities, and glutathione redox cycle were disrupted by 5-FU. Histopathological alterations in the crypts and villous were greater in the small intestine than in the colon. 5-FU decreased the number of peripheral and intestinal leukocytes, promoting an increase in T-cytotoxic cells and a decrease in T-helper and B cells. CONCLUSION: This pig model of intestinal dysfunction closely mimics the common side effects of cancer chemotherapy in humans, and provides a useful tool for evaluating novel antimucotoxic agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".