Hormone therapy and recurrence of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The route of estrogen administration is an important determinant of the risk of the first venous thromboembolism (VTE) event in postmenopausal women using hormone therapy (HT). However, the impact of transdermal estrogens on VTE recurrence risk has not been investigated. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of HT by route of estrogen administration on the risk of recurrent VTE. METHODS: A total of 1,023 consecutive postmenopausal women aged 45 to 70 years with a confirmed first VTE were recruited from an outpatient clinic of a hemostasis hospital unit between January 2000 and December 2008 and were followed for an average of 79 months after discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. RESULTS: Recurrent VTE occurred in 77 women (1.1% per year). During the follow-up, 130 women used HT (12.7%), including 103 transdermal estrogen users (10.0%) and 10 oral estrogen users (1.0%). After adjustment for potential confounders, there was no significant association between recurrent VTE and use of transdermal estrogens (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.4-2.4), with the nonusers as a reference group. In contrast, women using oral estrogens had an increased risk of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.5-27.3). Consistently, no subgroup of women had evidence of a risk of recurrent VTE with transdermal HT that significantly differed from that observed for all women. CONCLUSIONS: Oral but not transdermal estrogens are associated with a higher risk of recurrent VTE among postmenopausal women. This result provides further epidemiological evidence that transdermal estrogens may be safe with respect to VTE risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".