Nd and Pb isotopes from the Lake of the Woods greenstone belt, northwestern Ontario: implications for mantle evolution and the formation of crust in the southern Superior Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nd and Pb isotopes from the Lake of the Woods greenstone belt indicate the presence of three distinct reservoir sources: old enriched crust (>3.0 Ga); pre-2.7 Ga, homogeneous depleted mantle; and post-2.70 Ga heterogeneous mantle. EpsilonNd values of +1.1 to +2.3 for ultramafic to felsic metavolcanic rocks (2.742.72 Ga) indicate derivation from depleted mantle. The εNd value of 0.9 for younger turbidite (2.71 Ga), in conjunction with detrital zircon ages ranging from 2.72 to 3.0 Ga, indicates detritus from local greenstone belt sources (depleted mantle) mixed with an older crustal source. Post-2.70 Ga heterogeneity is demonstrated by εNd values ranging from 0.4 to +0.4 in shoshonitic to calc-alkaline metavolcanic rocks and +2.1 in a coeval ultrapotassic pluton. Pb isotopes from the pluton indicate derivation from a depleted mantle reservoir with an initial 207Pb/204Pb of 14.52, an initial 206Pb/204Pb of 13.29, and µ1 of 7.86. Isotopic comparison with post-2.70 Ga potassic suites from across the Superior Province indicates widespread mixing between depleted mantle and enriched end members. The enriched end member has isotopic characteristics of rocks derived from old crustal terrains, such as the Winnipeg River and Opatica subprovinces. This type of isotopic heterogeneity could be the result of crustal contamination or derivation from metasomatized mantle. Contamination of the mantle wedge by influx of fluids derived from partial melting of isotopically evolved, subducted sediments is favoured for the Superior Province potassic suite, because elevated concentration of Sr, Nd, and Pb in conjunction with primitive Mg#s suggest only limited crustal contamination has occurred.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".