MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978814183 · doi:10.1142/s0219622004001264

PROPOSITIONS OF FIVE EQUILIBRIA EXAMPLES FOR 3×2 CES/LES PURE EXCHANGE ECONOMIES

2004· article· en· W1978814183 on OpenAlex
Hui Huang, Shunming Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCentral China Normal UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsJumpRange (aeronautics)Parameter spaceEconomicsExchange economyMathematicsMathematical economicsEconomyPhysicsStatisticsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports numerical examples for a 3 individual 2 good CES/LES pure exchange economy in which 5 equilibria exist. We explore the size of the regions of the parameter space for which 5 equilibria persist, and show these ranges to be very small in each parameter. Other features of the equilibrium manifolds are examined. The number of equilibria can jump from 5 to 3 to 1, or even from 5 to 1. We also find changes of (Kehoe) equilibrium indices from -1 to +1 or from +1 to -1. Then, we provide parameter changes simultaneously in a large range that preserve given 5 equilibria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it