MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978814356 · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2014.06.007

Evaluating potential biodegradable twines for use in the snow crab fishery off Newfoundland and Labrador

2014· article· en· W1978814356 on OpenAlex
Paul D. Winger, George Legge, Christopher Batten, G.E. Bishop

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFisheryFishingSnowBreaking strengthEnvironmental scienceGeographyBiologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several technological advancements exist for the purpose of disabling baited traps if they are lost or abandoned at sea. In this study, we investigated various biodegradable twines for their potential use in the snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) fishery off Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The twines were deployed at sea for a duration of 124 days to measure degradation in breaking strength (kgf) over time. Results revealed significant variation in degradation rates among the twine types tested. Among the best performing twines, was the 3-ply cotton 96-thread twine. This twine exhibited a rapid and noticeable decline in breaking strength over the period of study with a total reduction of 63% of the initial strength upon conclusion of the study. This particular twine is now a mandatory condition of licence for all fishing enterprises targeting snow crab in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it