MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978820033 · doi:10.1115/ipc2010-31111

Response of Buried Plastic Pipelines Subject to Lateral Ground Movement

2010· article· en· W1978820033 on OpenAlex
Lalinda Weerasekara, Dharma Wijewickreme

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline transportPipeline (software)Tension (geology)BendingStructural engineeringPerpendicularNonlinear systemStress (linguistics)Geotechnical engineeringGeologyMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringUltimate tensile strengthComposite materialGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of pipelines in areas prone to ground deformations is a major concern for utility owners since the failures of such pipeline systems could cause property damage and even human losses, in addition to business disruption. An analytical solution to determine the response of plastic pipelines subject to abrupt relative ground movement occurring perpendicular to the pipe axis is presented herein. The method accounts for the combined impacts of tension and bending in a pipe segment. Furthermore, the model considers the nonlinear stress-strain behavior of the pipe material and employs an advanced analytical model to calculate the frictional force development along the pipeline. The results obtained from this analytical approach are validated by comparing with the results obtained from a numerical model using soil-spring analysis and the actual viscoelastic material behavior for the pipe material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it