The residual shear strength of tropical soils
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper discusses the residual shear strength of tropical soils. Ring shear tests have been performed with tropical soils from southern Brazil using the Bromhead apparatus. The data from the study are compared with data obtained in a comprehensive literature review of the subject. The residual friction angle of tropical residual soils from sedimentary formations decreases with increasing plasticity index following a general trend presented in the literature. Most of the residual soils described herein have also shown this trend. However, some of these residual soils, particularly basalt saprolitic soils, have shown quite low residual friction angles despite having low plasticity index and clay fraction values. It has been confirmed that the residual shear strength of tropical soils depends chiefly on mineralogy, particle size distribution, effective stress, parent rock, weathering degree, pedogenetic evolution and - when partly weathered minerals are present - degradation upon shearing. The substantial range of new data shown in the paper has allowed the definition of general boundaries of different soil behaviour in a chart of residual friction angle versus plasticity index. Each region has been associated with a different type of tropical soil.Key words: tropical soils, residual soils, residual shear strength, laboratory tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it