MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978891083 · doi:10.1103/physreve.73.061105

Effective classical partition functions with an improved time-dependent reference potential

2006· article· en· W1978891083 on OpenAlexafffund
Benoit Palmieri, David Ronis

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFeynman diagramPath integral formulationFormalism (music)PhysicsQuantumDensity matrixEquations of motionEuclidean geometryMathematicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical physicsStatistical physicsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original Feynman-Kleinert [Phys. Rev. A 34, 5080 (1986)] variational approach to Euclidean path integrals is improved by introducing a reference harmonic potential whose center is allowed to change with time. The motion of the center of the potential is varied such that the "effective potential" of Feynman and Kleinert is minimized and leads to an equation of motion for the classical path in the reference system that closely reproduces the "exact" average path. The formalism is applied to the double-well potential V(x)=-x(2)/2 + gx(4)/4+1/4g. This modification improves the accuracy of the approximate quantum-mechanical distribution function and, to a larger extent, the density matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicElectrostatics and Colloid InteractionsFrench-language works237,207