MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978900704 · doi:10.1007/s10227-005-0114-3

Multiple Cutaneous and Uterine Leiomyomas Associated with Gastric Gist

2005· article· en· W1978900704 on OpenAlexaff
Manisha Lamba, Shailendra Verma, Robert Prokopetz, Tadeusz A. Pierscianowski, Maha Jabi, Terence Moyana

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGiSTMedicineLeiomyomatosisLeiomyomaHysterectomyUterusLeiomyosarcomaUterine leiomyomaPathologyGynecologyInternal medicineStromal cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There are a number of reports documenting familial cases of leiomyomatosis cutis associated with uterine leiomyomata. However, to our knowledge, the association of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) with this entity has not as yet been reported. We report an interesting case of cutaneous leiomyomatosis, metachronous uterine leiomyomata, and a gastric GIST in a 43-year-old woman. OBSERVATION: The patient had previously undergone two separate uterine myomectomies at ages 25 and 26 years, respectively, followed by a hysterectomy at 27 years. At 36 years she underwent partial gastrectomy for excision of GIST and this was followed by the development of extensive, symptomatic cutaneous leiomyomata at 43 years. In the report, we have documented histological, immunohistochemical and clinical observations and furthermore report on the therapeutic measures undertaken. CONCLUSION: We report an interesting association of cutaneous leiomyomatosis, uterine leiomyomas and GIST.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207