MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978903266 · doi:10.1180/0026461056950283

Aqueous exposure and uptake of arsenic by riverside communities affected by mining contamination in the Río Pilcomayo basin, Bolivia

2005· article· en· W1978903266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrrigationArsenicDry seasonStructural basinDrainage basinEnvironmental scienceGeographyContaminationArchaeologyEnvironmental protectionGeologyChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The headwaters of the Río Pilcomayo drain the Cerro Rico de Potosí precious metal-polymetallic tin deposits of southern Bolivia. Mining of these deposits has taken place for around 500 years, leading to severe contamination of the Pilcomayo's waters and sediments for at least 200 km downstream. Communities living downstream of the mines and processing mills rely on the river water for irrigation, washing and occasionally, cooking and drinking, although most communities take their drinking water from springs located in the mountains above their village. This investigation focuses on arsenic exposure in people living in riverside communities up to 150 km downstream of the source. Sampling took place in April–May 2003 (dry season) and was repeated in January–March 2004 (wet season) in five communities: El Molino, Tasapampa, Tuero Chico, Sotomayor and Cota. Cota was the control in 2003 and again in 2004; a nearby city, Sucre, and several locations in the UK were also used as controls in 2004. Drinking, irrigation and river waters, hair and urine samples were collected in each community, digested where appropriate and analysed for As using ICP-MS. Arsenic concentrations in drinking waters ranged 0.2–112 μg 1 –1 , irrigation water 0.6–329 μg 1 –1 , river waters 0.9–12,800 μg 1 –1 , hair 37–2110 μg kg –1 and urine 11–891 μg 1 –1 . All but one drinking water sample was found to contain As below the World Health Organization recommended guideline of 10 μg 1 –1 , although a number of irrigation and river water concentrations were above Canadian and Bolivian guidelines. Many As concentrations in the hair and urine samples from this study exceeded published values for non-occupationally exposed subjects. Analysis of mean concentration values for all media types showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the control locations and the communities exposed to known As contamination, suggesting that the source of As may not be mining-related. Arsenic concentration appears to increase as a function of age in hair samples from males and females older than 30 years. Male volunteers over the age of 35 showed increasing urine-As concentrations as a function of age, whereas the opposite was true for the females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it