Retention of Heme in Axial Ligand Mutants of Succinate-Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase (Complex II) from Escherichia coli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (SdhCDAB, complex II) from Escherichia coli is a four-subunit membrane-bound respiratory complex that catalyzes ubiquinone reduction by succinate. In the E. coli enzyme, heme b(556) is ligated between SdhC His(84) and SdhD His(71). Contrary to a previous report (Vibat, C. R. T., Cecchini, G., Nakamura, K., Kita, K., and Gennis, R. B. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 4148-4159), we demonstrate the presence of heme in both SdhC H84L and SdhD H71Q mutants of SdhCDAB. EPR spectroscopy reveals the presence of low spin heme in the SdhC H84L (g(z) = 2.92) mutant and high spin heme in the SdhD H71Q mutant (g = 6.0). The presence of low spin heme in the SdhC H84L mutant suggests that the heme b(556) is able to pick up another ligand from the protein. CO binds to the reduced form of the mutants, indicating that it is able to displace one of the ligands to the low spin heme of the SdhC H84L mutant. The g = 2.92 signal of the SdhC H84L mutant titrates with a redox potential at pH 7.0 (E(m)(,7)) of approximately +15 mV, whereas the g = 6.0 signal of the SdhD H71Q mutant titrates with an E(m)(,7) of approximately -100 mV. The quinone site inhibitor pentachlorophenol perturbs the heme optical spectrum of the wild-type and SdhD H71Q mutant enzymes but not the SdhC H84L mutant. This finding suggests that the latter residue also plays an important role in defining the quinone binding site of the enzyme. The SdhC H84L mutation also results in a significant increase in the K(m) and a decrease in the k(cat) for ubiquinone-1, whereas the SdhD H71Q mutant has little effect on these parameters. Overall, these data indicate that SdhC His(84) has an important role in defining the interaction of SdhCDAB with both quinones and heme b(556).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".