MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978916393 · doi:10.1109/mobhoc.2006.278618

MITECRO: a protocol for sensor networks to MInimize Total Energy consumption during each ROund of sensed data gathering

2006· article· en· W1978916393 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Habibur Rahman, Obidul Islam, Sajid Hussain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy consumptionWireless sensor networkProtocol (science)Computer scienceComputer networkNode (physics)Real-time computingEnergy (signal processing)Data collectionBase stationSensor nodeEfficient energy useKey distribution in wireless sensor networksEngineeringTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringWireless network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Common applications of sensor networks include continuous monitoring where sensors are deployed over a region and the sensed data are gathered at a distant base station periodically. In each round of data gathering, our MITECRO protocol minimizes the total energy consumption of the sensor network. This may however unbalance energy consumption over all sensor nodes. As a result, few nodes may die earlier than the others. Experiments show that MITECRO nearly doubles the network lifetime compared to existing protocol that optimally balances all sensors' energy consumption. Since MITECRO cannot ensure 100% node availability throughout the network's lifetime, overall sensing coverage might be compromised. We argue that the more sensor nodes have overlapping sensing coverage, the better our protocol will perform in maximizing network lifetime without significantly compromising overall sensing coverage

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207