MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1978959432 · doi:10.1029/2004gl020159

Heat flow in the Nipigon arm of the Keweenawan rift, northwestern Ontario, Canada

2004· article· en· W1978959432 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Heidi Perry, Claude Jaupart, J. Mareschal, F. Rolandone, G. Bienfait

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut national des sciences de l'UniversCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsGeologyMaficSillRiftArcheanCrustGeomorphologyOceanographyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Archean Superior Province, the Nipigon Embayment, in the area of Lake Nipigon north of Lake Superior, is covered by MidProterozoic sediments intruded by Keweenawan diabase sills. It has been interpreted as a failed arm of the ca. 1100 Ma Keweenawan rift. Six new heat flow values in this area show that the region of low heat flow associated with the Keweenawan rift in Lake Superior extends northwards along the western margin of the Nipigon Embayment. The average heat flow in the Nipigon area (39 ± 5 mWm−2) is only slightly lower than that of the adjacent western Superior Province (42 ± 8 mWm−2), indicating that the volume of Keweenawan mafic intrusives in the Nipigon crust is small.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→