On the Growth of Fluorocarbon Thin Films Deposited on Plasma‐Etched 316L Stainless Steel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Plasma fluorocarbon films deposited on 316L stainless steel have shown promising adhesion properties as potential stent coatings. However, further analyses revealed the occurrence of nano‐defects, which led to water infiltration and delamination. Plasma etchings with two different gases, C 2 F 6 and H 2 , were applied prior to the coating deposition in order to etch the oxide layer of the stainless steel and to create activated sites on the surface to promote the polymerization. Surfaces and thin layers were analyzed by atomic force microscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, time of flight‐secondary ion mass spectrometry, fourier‐transform infra‐red spectroscopy, and near edge X‐ray absorption fine structure to study the film growth mechanism. Hydrogen etchings demonstrated to play a crucial role in the first step of the fluorocarbon growth through the formation of hydroxides at the stainless steel surface, which served as initiator during plasma polymerization. magnified image
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it