Study of Sustainable Settlements of Hawraman, Kurdistan, and Its Sustainable Approaches to Design of a Residential Complex in Mosha Touristic Village, Iran
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scholars are increasingly interested in investigating vernacular settlements to discover how they have been sustainable over time and find those utilized strategies which can be utilitarian for the present. Villages of Hawraman, are hitherto uninvestigated settlements in a mountainous region of Kurdistan. Considering their special sustainable characteristics plus climatic similarities of Hawraman region with the site of our project, a residential complex in Mosha touristic village, we studied extensively on these vernacular settlements. At first, through survey method in a descriptive - analytic way we extracted their sustainable characteristics in fields of environmental, economic and social issues. Second, we designed our practical project based on our inspirations from extracted features. At the end, we indicated our project’s environmental sustainable advantages rather than surrounding complexes via comparing the rate of energy consumption. In addition, by measuring the degree of social interactions, Social sustainable advantages of our project have been proved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it