Identification for Control of Low Pressure Die Casting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Controlling and eliminating defects, such as macro-porosity, in die casting processes is an on-going challenge for manufacturers. Current strategies for eliminating defects focus on the execution of a pre-set casting cycle, die structure design or the combination of both. To respond to process variability and mitigate its negative effects, advanced process control methodologies may be employed to dynamically adjust the operational parameters of the process. In this work, a finite element heat transfer model, validated by comparison with experimental data, has been developed to predict the evolution of temperatures and the volume of liquid encapsulation in an experimental casting process. A virtual process, made up of the heat transfer model and a wrapper script for communication, has been employed to simulate the continuous operation of the real process. A stochastic state-space model, based on data from measurements and the virtual process, has been developed to provide a reliable representation of this virtual process. The parameters of the deterministic portion result from system identification of the virtual process, whereas the parameters of the stochastic portion arise from the analysis and comparison of measurement data with virtual process data. The resulting state-space model, which can be extended to a multi-input multi-output model, will facilitate the design of a model-based controller for this process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".