MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979001792 · doi:10.1139/y04-124

Na<sup>+</sup> overload-induced mitochondrial damage in the ischemic heart

2004· review· en· W1979001792 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Satoshi Takeo, Kouichi Tanonaka

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitochondrionInternal medicineCardiologyOxidative stressMedicineChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemia induces a decrease in myocardial contractility that may lead more or less to contractile dysfunction in the heart. When the duration of ischemia is relatively short, myocardial contractility is immediately reversed to control levels upon reperfusion. In contrast, reperfusion induces myocardial cell death when the heart is exposed to a prolonged period of ischemia. This phenomenon is the so-called "reperfusion injury". Numerous investigators have reported the mechanisms underlying myocardial reperfusion injury such as generation of free radicals, disturbance in the intracellular ion homeostasis, and lack of energy for contraction. Despite a variety of investigations concerning the mechanisms for ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury, ionic disturbances have been proposed to play an important role in the genesis of the ischemia-reperfusion injury. In this present study, we focused on the contribution of Na+ overload and mitochondrial dysfunction during ischemia to the genesis of this ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207