Everything is Corrected: Corruption, Terror, Intelligentsia, and the State in Edvard Radzinsky's <i>Conversations with Socrates</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this essay, I will examine two absences within the text of Edvard Radzinsky's Conversations with Socrates: the absence of a proper name for the First Disciple and the lack of any references to male same-sex desire. I argue that these absences are meaningful and interconnected features in the text that, in the context of Russian history, complicate Radzinsky's own cherished position as a gadfly of the state and deface his portrait of Socrates as an analogue for the heroic intelligentsia. Ultimately, I suggest that the absence of same-sex desire functions as a pathology, as a hidden metonym for the historic guilt of the Russian intelligentsia and its role in the excesses of the Soviet regime. Finally, I argue that such erasures are implicated in the geopolitical oppositions and gendered/sexualized national identities that inflected and constituted the Cold War.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".