MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979017224 · doi:10.7202/022053ar

La rébellion de 1837-1838 au Bas Canada : une approche géographique.

2005· article· fr· W1979017224 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Allan Greer, Léon Robichaud

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de la GaspésieCampus Notre-Dame-de-FoyUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude vise une meilleure compréhension de la rébellion de 1837-1838 au Bas-Canada, de la nature même du conflit ainsi que de ses antécédents sociaux et économiques, à travers l'examen des composantes régionales de l'insurrection. Bien qu'ils aient été largement appuyés à travers l'ensemble de la province, les « patriotes » révolutionnaires étaient mieux ancrés dans l'Ouest du Bas-Canada. Cette région, correspondant au district de Montréal, était plus prospère, dynamique et urbanisée que les autres régions rurales du Bas-Canada. Selon les interprétations traditionnelles, l'insurrection aurait été liée aux problèmes agraires; il semble cependant que seule la paisible région de Québec était menacée par la famine. La rébellion prit naissance non pas au sein des campagnes appauvries mais plutôt dans des régions où anglophones et francophones vivaient à proximité les uns des autres et où les redevances seigneuriales étaient comparativement élevées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.015
Science and technology studies0.0110.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de géographie du QuébecSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207