MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979027189 · doi:10.1109/tce.2013.6626245

Video super resolution using contourlet transform and bilateral total variation filter

2013· article· en· W1979027189 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContourletComputer scienceDeblurringComputer visionArtificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)Frame (networking)Resolution (logic)Image processingWavelet transformImage (mathematics)Image restorationWaveletTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a new approach for video super resolution problem. To this end Compressive Sensing (CS) theory along with contourlet transform has been used. In CS framework the signal is assumed to be sparse in a transform domain. An approach has been suggested using this fact in which contourlet domain is used as the transform domain and a CS algorithm helps to find the high resolution frame. A post processing step is applied afterward to the estimated outputs to increase the quality. The post processing step consists of a deblurring term and a Bilateral Total Variation (BTV) filter for increasing the consistency. This method helps to relax the conditions on hardware and increase the quality of the video after capturing, in fact the quality of the video streams in consumer applications can be increased even the capturing device represents the scene in a low resolution format. Experimental results show significant improvement over existing super resolution methods in both objective and subjective quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it