Effects of Participation in Activities Organized by the Sarong Conservation Club on Islamic Behavior of Youth in Ban Sarong, Khao Tum Sub-district, Yarang District, Pattani Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aimed to investigate the effects of participation in activities organized by the Sarong ConservationClub on Islamic behavior of youth in Ban Sarong, Khao Tum Sub-district, Yarang District, Pattani Province. Thestudy applied a true control group pretest and posttest design with 70 youths selected using purposive samplingfrom youths with low and high scores obtained from answering questions in an Islamic behavioral appraisalinstrument. The youths were divided into an experimental group consisting of 35 youths who participated inactivities organized by the Sarong Conservation Club (youths with low scores) and a control group consisting of35 youths who participated in religious activities organized by the mosque (youths with high scores). Theexperiment was performed according to plan from January 2014 to July 2014. The data were analyzed usingindependent samples t-test and paired samples t-test.The results of the study revealed that prior to participation the experimental group who participated in activitiesorganized by the Sarong Conservation Club had Islamic behavior at a level that was significantly lower than thecontrol group who participated in religious activities organized by the mosque at the level of .001. However,after participating in activities organized by the Sarong Conservation Club, the experimental group had asignificantly higher level of Islamic behavior than the control group at .01. The youths in the experimental groupwho participated in activities organized by the Sarong Conservation Club, and those in the control group whoparticipated in religious activities organized by the mosque had Islamic behavior at a significantly higher levelthan before their participation in the activities at .001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".