MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FUEL CELL HEAT RECOVERY, ELECTRICAL LOAD MANAGEMENT, AND THE ECONOMICS OF SOLAR-HYDROGEN SYSTEMS

2010· article· en· W1979054618 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bahman Shabani, John Andrews, S. P. S. Badwal

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Power and Energy Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringHydrogen fuelElectric potential energySolar energyElectrical loadProton exchange membrane fuel cellWaste managementFuel cellsProcess engineeringNuclear engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringChemical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer modelling of a solar-hydrogen system to supply a remote household in southeast Australia has been conducted. Electrical load management and fuel-cell heat recovery have been investigated to improve the system's economy. The results reveal that the cost of the solar hydrogen system can be reduced by over 10% by managing the peak demand and accordingly the capacity of the fuel cell while keeping the average daily electrical energy supplied constant. Interestingly, increasing the size of the fuel cell up to a certain level above the minimum required actually lowers the average unit cost of energy supplied since the fuel cell operates at lower current densities and hence better efficiency. A smaller PV array, electrolyser and hydrogen tank are then required as well. Heat recovered from the fuel cell and used to substitute for LPG in a domestic hot water unit could lead to a further reduction in the overall capital cost of the household's energy system. While the recoverable heat available was found to be less if optimal load management is also applied, there remained a net economic benefit of supplying both heat and power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Power and Energy SystemsSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207