MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979062976 · doi:10.1029/1999ja900455

Wind observations of mixed magnetosheath‐plasma sheet ions deep inside the magnetosphere

2000· article· en· W1979062976 on OpenAlexaff
T. D. Phan, Robert P. Lin, S. A. Fuselier, M. Fujimoto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetosheathPlasma sheetMagnetospherePopulationPhysicsMagnetopauseSolar windPlasmaIonAtomic physicsGeophysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have analyzed in detail a Wind spacecraft crossing of the high‐latitude magnetosheath, magnetopause, lobe, and the high‐ and low‐latitude plasma sheet on November 27, 1998. The crossing occurred during the first perigee pass of Wind's (new) high‐inclination (45°) petal orbit. Between the lobe and the hot plasma sheet on the duskside, an extended region (xGSM∼ −2.8 to −7.8 RE, yGSM∼ 7.8 RE, zGSM∼ −11.6 to −4.3 RE) of mixed low‐energy magnetosheath and high‐energy plasma sheet ion populations was detected. This region was detected in a region of strong (∼ 40 nT) and steady lobe‐like magnetic field and ceased to exist when the spacecraft approached the neutral sheet. The mixed ion populations are remarkably similar (in their thermal properties) to the distributions detected in the adjacent magnetosheath and plasma sheet proper, except that the mixed ions are nearly stagnant. As the neutral sheet is approached, the low‐energy component of the mixed ions is gradually heated, while the high‐energy component is unmodified. Near the neutral sheet the ion distributions are dominated by a single, high‐energy population. The electron behavior is significantly different from that of the ions. In the mixed ion region the electrons consist of a single population with energy between those of the magnetosheath and the plasma sheet proper. Electron pitch angle information suggests that the entire mixed region is on closed field lines. However, the large reduction of high‐energy plasma sheet electrons in this region may indicate that the field lines threading this regions were once open. The exact path of plasma entry to form the mixed region cannot be discerned with single‐point observations, especially since the mixed ions are stagnant. However, it is possible (for this event) to rule out the mantle as a source for the low‐energy component of the mixed ions. The similarity between the thermal property of the low‐energy component of the mixed ions and the magnetosheath population suggests that the magnetosheath plasma had direct access to this region without significant heating along its path. The presence of nearly unmodified magnetosheath plasma deep inside the magnetosphere raises questions concerning the processes of plasma entry across the magnetopause. Finally, the mixed region in this event was detected during an extended period of persistent northward and duskward interplanetary magnetic field, which makes this event ideal for model comparisons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207