MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979098791 · doi:10.1007/s10672-014-9242-5

Good Intentions? Employer Representative Conceptualizations and, Challenges to the Workplace Accommodation Process: The Case of Electrical Injuries

2014· article· en· W1979098791 on OpenAlexafffund
Mary Stergiou‐Kita, Elizabeth Mansfield, Liane Daiter, Angela Colantonio

Bibliographic record

VenueEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersInstitute of Gender and HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchToronto Rehabilitation InstituteOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareWorkplace Safety and Insurance Board
KeywordsAccommodationReasonable accommodationThematic analysisPsychosocialIdentification (biology)Work (physics)PsychologyPublic relationsProcess (computing)Qualitative researchBusinessApplied psychologySociologyPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEmployee Responsibilities and Rights JournalSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207