MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979105263 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.07.029

Additivity‐based design of the strongest possible turkey ovomucoid third domain inhibitors for porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) and<i>Streptomyces griseus</i>protease B (SGPB)

2013· article· en· W1979105263 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohammad Qasim, Lixia Wang, Sabiha Qasim, Stephen Lu, Wuyuan Lu, Richard Wynn, Zheng-Ping Yi, M. Laskowski

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesUniversity of AlbertaPurdue University
KeywordsStreptomyces griseusProteasesPancreatic elastaseSerine proteaseElastaseProteaseChemistryEnzymeResidue (chemistry)StereochemistrySerineSerine Proteinase InhibitorsProtease inhibitor (pharmacology)BiochemistryStreptomycesBiologyVirologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe here successful designs of strong inhibitors for porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) and Streptomyces griseus protease B (SGPB). For each enzyme two inhibitor variants were designed. In one, the reactive site residue (position 18) was retained and the best residues were substituted at contact positions 13, 14, and 15. In the other variant the best residues were substituted at all contact positions except the reactive site where a Gly was substituted. The four designed variants were: for PPE, T(13)E(14)Y(15)-OMTKY3 and T(13)E(14)Y(15)G(18)M(21)P(32)V(36)-OMTKY3, and for SGPB, S(13)D(14)Y(15)-OMTKY3 and S(13)D(14)Y(15)G(18)I(19)K(21)-OMTKY3. The free energies of association (ΔG(0)) of expressed variants have been measured with the proteases for which they were designed as well as with five other serine proteases and the results are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207