MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979115455 · doi:10.1177/1045389x06056501

A Finite Element for Piezoelectric Multilayered Plates: Combined Higher-order and Piecewise Linear C0 Formulation

2006· article· en· W1979115455 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Cotoni, Patrice Masson, François Cĉté

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodDisplacement (psychology)PiezoelectricityPiecewise linear functionMathematical analysisPlane (geometry)PiecewiseMathematicsQuadratic equationGeometryPhysicsStructural engineeringAcousticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A finite element is presented for the static and dynamic analysis of smart multilayered plates. A fourth-order expansion is combined with a piecewise linear term to describe the distribution of the in-plane displacements through the thickness. The out-of-plane displacement is assumed constant through the thickness. Both free edges and interlaminar continuity conditions are satisfied, thus reducing the number of elastic unknowns to nine whatever be the number of layers. To this aim, two redundant unknowns describing the two derivatives of the out-of-plane displacement with respect to the in-plane coordinates are introduced and related to the out-of-plane displacement by the use of penalty functions. A quadratic distribution of the electric potential is used inside each piezoelectric layer to completely account for the piezoelectric coupling effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and StructuresSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207