MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979121408 · doi:10.1002/9780470514061.ch13

The Role of TGF‐β in Pulmonary Fibrosis

2007· review· en· W1979121408 on OpenAlexaff
Nasreen Khalil, Harry B. Greenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueNovartis Foundation symposium · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulmonary fibrosisLungPathogenesisPathologyFibrosisIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisMedicineConnective tissueImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary fibrosis is an irreversible accumulation of connective tissue in the interstitium of the lung. The pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis is not well understood. Research on animal models and studies of human lung disease suggest the initiating events may be a combination of pulmonary injury and the recruitment of inflammatory cells, mainly macrophages. A number of well characterized cytokines, including TGF-beta, have been either found in the injured lung or produced by inflammatory cells removed from the lung. In an animal model of pulmonary fibrosis, TGF-beta production is increased prior to collagen synthesis and is mainly produced by alveolar macrophages. In advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a human fibrotic lung disease, extensive TGF-beta deposition can be detected by immunohistochemical staining, primarily in epithelial cells in areas of lung regeneration and remodelling. This suggests that the pathogenesis of the progressive fibrosis characteristic of this lung disease may be an aberrant repair process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNovartis Foundation symposiumSame topicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisFrench-language works237,207