MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979125172 · doi:10.1029/2005eo070006

EarthScope science for Mid‐America

2005· article· en· W1979125172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Bodin, Charles A. Langston, Gary W. Paterson, C. A. Powell, Mitch Withers, Joan Gomberg

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultidisciplinary approachWork (physics)Variety (cybernetics)GeologyArchaeologyLibrary scienceGeographyPolitical scienceEngineeringLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In mid‐America (roughly the region between the Rocky and Appalachian mountains, and between the U.S./Canadian border and the Gulf of Mexico), the National Science Foundation's (NSF) EarthScope program presents important opportunities to advance the understanding of the evolution, composition, and hazards of the North American heartland. EarthScope (http://www.earthscope.org) will help to image the geological roots of North America at unprecedented resolution with a variety of geophysical techniques. The program challenges the solid Earth science community to define multidisciplinary science objectives that further both the technical knowledge and the societal impact of our work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207