Effects of co-fermentation with Candida stellata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the aroma and composition of Chardonnay wine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects of several inoculation protocols using Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain AWRI 838 (an isolate of Lalvin EC11 18) and Candida stellata strain AWRI 1159 (CBS 2649) upon the aroma properties and chemical composition of Chardonnay wine were determined. An increase in the concentration of glycerol and acetic acid was observed when fermentation was performed with C. stellata AWRI 1159, which did not progress to dryness. Sensory descriptive analysis showed a substantial difference in aroma between the wines produced by monocultures of the two yeast species. The Candida stellata AWRI 1159 produced significantly more intense ‘honey’, ‘apricot’, and ‘sauerkraut’ aromas, and diminished the ‘lime’, ‘banana’‘tropical fruit’ and ‘floral’ aromas ascribed to S. cerevisiae AWRI 838. When C. stellata AWRI 1159 was co-inoculated at ten times the initial concentration of strain S. cerevisiae AWRI 838, the non- Saccharomyces yeast had only a minor impact upon wine aroma and composition despite maintaining a significant viable population of 5–10 times 106 colony forming units per mL throughout fermentation. Wine of a different aroma profile to either of the reference monoculture wines was produced by sequential fermentation, whereby C. stellata AWRI 1159 conducted the first half of fermentation, before inoculation with S. cerevisiae AWRI 838, and the subsequent completion of fermentation. This wine had ‘floral’, ‘banana’, ‘lime’, ‘tropical fruit’ and ‘sauerkraut’ aroma scores intermediate to the two reference monoculture wines, ‘apricot’ and ‘honey’ aroma ratings similar to the S. cerevisiae AWRI 838 wine, and ‘ethyl acetate’ aroma that exceeded that of both reference wines. These results suggest the potential of a reliable mixed culture fermentation strategy for exploiting unconventional, fermentation-impaired yeasts for producing greater flavour diversity in wine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it