Outcome of Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who underwent liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. METHODS: All patients who underwent liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis at our institution were identified. A review of patients' hospital and office charts was performed; all patients were then contacted, and a detailed survey was administered by telephone. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were identified. There were 53 males (76.8 percent) and 16 females, with a mean age of 45.3 (+/- 13.3) years. Fifty-two (75.4 percent) of the 69 patients had documented inflammatory bowel disease; of these, 40 had ulcerative colitis (76.9 percent), 11 had Crohn's disease, and 1 had indeterminate colitis. Thirty-one patients (60 percent) were diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease before primary sclerosing cholangitis, with a mean interval to diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis of 10.8 (+/- 10.3) years. Seven patients had both diagnoses made at roughly the same time, and 14 patients initially were diagnosed with primary sclerosing cholangitis and subsequently were found to have inflammatory bowel disease, with a mean interval of 5.2 (+/- 4.4) years; 5 (35.7 percent) of those 14 patients were only diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease after their liver transplant. The mean time from diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis to liver transplantation was 6.1 (+/- 4.9) years. Since their transplant, 30.8 percent of patients rated their colitis as worse, 38.5 percent felt it was unchanged, and 30.8 percent felt that their colitis was better controlled. Eight (15.4 percent) of the 52 patients with inflammatory bowel disease denied having any knowledge of an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Four patients have required colectomy for colorectal neoplasia after liver transplantation, at a mean of 4.7 years after transplantation. Of the patients with inflammatory bowel disease, 42 (80.1 percent) had at least 1 posttransplant surveillance colonoscopy. Eight of the remaining ten patients had a colectomy, leaving only two patients (3.8 percent) who had not been surveyed. However, only 32 (61.5 percent) of the patients with inflammatory bowel disease have been on a surveillance regimen that would approximately conform to current screening recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The activity of inflammatory bowel disease after transplantation is highly variable. Patients appeared to lack knowledge of their increased risk for colorectal neoplasia. Colorectal cancer is an uncommon but important complication in patients after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis, and ongoing surveillance is required. Patients may require education to increase their awareness of the cancer risk and compliance with surveillance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".