MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1979200508 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.054404

Role of interfaces in the magnetoresistance of Au/Fe/Au/Fe multilayers

2003· article· en· W1979200508 on OpenAlexaff
P. Weinberger, J. Zabloudil, Robert Hammerling, L. Szunyogh, T. L. Monchesky, B. Heinrich

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersHungarian Science FoundationHungarian Scientific Research FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsMagnetoresistanceGiant magnetoresistanceMaterials scienceCoherent potential approximationMonolayerSpin (aerodynamics)Kubo formulaPhysicsElectronic structureThermodynamicsConductivityQuantum mechanicsNanotechnologyMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using the fully relativistic spin-polarized screened Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker method and the corresponding Kubo-Greenwood equation resistivities and the giant magnetoresistance are evaluated for Fe/Au/Fe/Au spin valves assuming both bcc-like Fe and fcc-Au leads. The theoretically obtained values for a spacer thickness of 7 monolayers of Au are in a rather good agreement with the corresponding experimental data. These data, in particular the temperature dependence of the resistivities reported in here, are analyzed with respect to the experimental setup and related to the theoretical models assumed. Since in the theoretical calculations interdiffused interfaces are taken into account by means of the inhomogeneous coherent potential approximation, the role of the interfaces in the magnetoresistance of this system can be discussed rigorously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207